Cody
Enterprise AI assistant with unmatched multi-repo codebase context (cross-repository MCP server, 1M-token window, up to 10 repos searched simultaneously, 300K+ repos, 90GB+ monorepos).
Dimension breakdown
Score · confidenceEnterprise AI assistant with unmatched multi-repo codebase context (cross-repository MCP server, 1M-token window, up to 10 repos searched simultaneously, 300K+ repos, 90GB+ monorepos). Pure enterprise product after Free/Pro discontinuation (July 2025); vendor pricing page shows 'Starting at $16K' with sales-quoted per-user rates — pricing-opacity cap remains.
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, SSO/SAML/SCIM/granular-RBAC, audit logs, self-hosted/air-gapped (local Ollama inference), Context Filters, Leidos government pathway. Now led by CEO Dan Adler; Amp Inc. fully independent under Quinn Slack — frontier agentic development has left Cody's roadmap and Cody stays conversational.
Code Review Agent still absent from Cody GA through May 2026. Best fit: regulated industries with large legacy codebases requiring air-gapped deployment and cross-repo context.
NOT for teams prioritizing autonomous agentic workflows — that path is Amp.
Use cases
Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.
Risk flags
Pricing opacity
enterpriseConditionalNo public pricing or highly opaque pricing model
Caps Enterprise / Compliance at 75
Removed when — Public pricing published with clear tier structure and no hidden costs reported
Status rationale
Assessed because Cody Enterprise is actively deployed at F500 scale (4/6 top US banks, Leidos, Booking.com, Palo Alto Networks confirmed), receives weekly product updates, and carries positive third-party enterprise reviews (Gartner Peer Insights 4.3/5) — substantial evidence short of fresh first-party production metrics or hands-on testing this cycle. However: (a) Amp independence structurally separates frontier agentic capabilities from Cody, which stays conversational, (b) Code Review Agent remains absent from Cody GA after multiple months of expectation, (c) vendor pricing page remains opaque triggering pricing-opacity cap, (d) team contracted ~21% to ~148 employees (TrueUp, May 2026, down from ~187), (e) no funding refresh in ~5 years creates sustainability questions at AI-arms-race scale, (f) mindshare continues to collapse — Cody is absent entirely from JetBrains' Apr-2026 developer-adoption study.
Movement triggers
Upgrade to In Review if: Code Review Agent and at least one additional autonomous agent (migration, testing) reach GA for Cody Enterprise AND Sourcegraph publishes explicit Cody Enterprise multi-year agentic roadmap AND vendor publishes transparent per-user pricing on official pricing page (would remove pricing-opacity cap). Downgrade to Deferred if: Sourcegraph announces Cody Enterprise sunset, headcount drops below 100, named-layoff event >20%, or no new funding within 24 months as revenue base pressures R&D.
Risks & limitations
Pricing Opacity
ModerateRadar cap: pricing-opacity
Integration surface
Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.
Adoption & benchmarks
Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.
Spotted something wrong or missing here? Suggest a change →
Per-source contributions
Click any dimension to see the underlying sources and citations.
More in this category