Skip to main content
World Wide TechnologyBenchAI tool benchmarks
Coding Assistant
StatusEmerging
SignalAssessed
EvidenceGrade B

Cody

61
C+ 0 vs last quarter

Enterprise AI assistant with unmatched multi-repo codebase context (cross-repository MCP server, 1M-token window, up to 10 repos searched simultaneously, 300K+ repos, 90GB+ monorepos).

UX / DXCapabilityReliabilityValueCommunityEnterpriseAutonomyIntegration

Dimension breakdown

Score · confidence
UX / DX
50% conf60
Capability
50% conf80
ReliabilityIncomplete data at this time
Value
50% conf50
CommunityIncomplete data at this time
Enterprise / Compliance
50% conf70
Autonomy
50% conf40
Integration
50% conf65
Sources blend review platforms, community sentiment, the Signal Radar and practitioner ratings. Scores re-blend each quarter.

Enterprise AI assistant with unmatched multi-repo codebase context (cross-repository MCP server, 1M-token window, up to 10 repos searched simultaneously, 300K+ repos, 90GB+ monorepos). Pure enterprise product after Free/Pro discontinuation (July 2025); vendor pricing page shows 'Starting at $16K' with sales-quoted per-user rates — pricing-opacity cap remains.

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, SSO/SAML/SCIM/granular-RBAC, audit logs, self-hosted/air-gapped (local Ollama inference), Context Filters, Leidos government pathway. Now led by CEO Dan Adler; Amp Inc. fully independent under Quinn Slack — frontier agentic development has left Cody's roadmap and Cody stays conversational.

Code Review Agent still absent from Cody GA through May 2026. Best fit: regulated industries with large legacy codebases requiring air-gapped deployment and cross-repo context.

NOT for teams prioritizing autonomous agentic workflows — that path is Amp.

Recommended

Use cases

Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.

Score caps

Risk flags

  • Pricing opacity

    enterpriseConditional

    No public pricing or highly opaque pricing model

    Caps Enterprise / Compliance at 75

    Removed whenPublic pricing published with clear tier structure and no hidden costs reported

Assessment

Status rationale

Assessed because Cody Enterprise is actively deployed at F500 scale (4/6 top US banks, Leidos, Booking.com, Palo Alto Networks confirmed), receives weekly product updates, and carries positive third-party enterprise reviews (Gartner Peer Insights 4.3/5) — substantial evidence short of fresh first-party production metrics or hands-on testing this cycle. However: (a) Amp independence structurally separates frontier agentic capabilities from Cody, which stays conversational, (b) Code Review Agent remains absent from Cody GA after multiple months of expectation, (c) vendor pricing page remains opaque triggering pricing-opacity cap, (d) team contracted ~21% to ~148 employees (TrueUp, May 2026, down from ~187), (e) no funding refresh in ~5 years creates sustainability questions at AI-arms-race scale, (f) mindshare continues to collapse — Cody is absent entirely from JetBrains' Apr-2026 developer-adoption study.

Watch for

Movement triggers

Upgrade to In Review if: Code Review Agent and at least one additional autonomous agent (migration, testing) reach GA for Cody Enterprise AND Sourcegraph publishes explicit Cody Enterprise multi-year agentic roadmap AND vendor publishes transparent per-user pricing on official pricing page (would remove pricing-opacity cap). Downgrade to Deferred if: Sourcegraph announces Cody Enterprise sunset, headcount drops below 100, named-layoff event >20%, or no new funding within 24 months as revenue base pressures R&D.

Caution

Risks & limitations

  • Pricing Opacity

    Moderate

    Radar cap: pricing-opacity

Capabilities

Integration surface

Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.

Proof points

Adoption & benchmarks

Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.

Spotted something wrong or missing here? Suggest a change →

Per-source contributions

Click any dimension to see the underlying sources and citations.