Augment Code

B▲ 0 vs last quarter

Enterprise AI coding platform with best-in-class Context Engine (500K files, cross-repo, ~100ms retrieval) and #1 SWE-bench Pro ranking (51.80%, Scale AI).

Rate this tool Add to compare

Dimension breakdown

Score · confidence

UX / DX

78% conf64

Capability

78% conf61

ReliabilityIncomplete data at this time

Value

50% conf75

CommunityIncomplete data at this time

Enterprise / Compliance

50% conf75

Autonomy

50% conf80

Integration

50% conf70

Sources blend review platforms, community sentiment, the Signal Radar and practitioner ratings. Scores re-blend each quarter.

Enterprise AI coding platform with best-in-class Context Engine (500K files, cross-repo, ~100ms retrieval) and #1 SWE-bench Pro ranking (51.80%, Scale AI). Cosmos agentic OS (public preview May 2026, MAX-only) adds team-wide shared memory, Expert Registry, and coordinated SDLC agents.

Intent multi-agent workspace (public beta, macOS-only, Windows waitlist) runs a Coordinator→parallel Specialists (git worktrees)→Verifier loop. Prism model router (Claude+Gemini / GPT+Kimi variants) delivers 20–30% cost reduction at parity quality.

Governance posture strengthened: SOC 2 Type II + ISO/IEC 42001 (first AI coding assistant, Coalfire), air-gapped/VPC/on-prem deployment, CMEK, zero data retention, single-tenant, SIEM, GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA. Native agent integrations (GitHub, Linear, Jira, Confluence, Notion, Sentry, Stripe) plus Enterprise Slack close the prior team-tooling gap. DXC Technology (F500, 50K devs, 'year to 10 days'), Tekion, Pure Storage, MongoDB, WEX, Intercom, Rubrik publicly named.

Primary concerns persist: credit-based pricing controversy (sustained r/AugmentCodeAI 'bait-and-switch' sentiment, quantified credit burn), CEO transition (Dietzen→McClernan, early 2026), Intent macOS-only, Cosmos MAX-only preview, ongoing reliability complaints (HTTP 400/502, crashes).

Recommended

Use cases

Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.

Score caps

Risk flags

No active caps — no risk flags apply to this tool right now.

Assessment

Status rationale

Tracked — maintains current signal level. Strong technical differentiation (Context Engine, #1 SWE-bench Pro 51.80%, ISO/IEC 42001, air-gapped/CMEK governance), now-closed team-tooling integration gap, and strong enterprise adoption evidence (DXC F500 50K devs with 'year to 10 days' case study, Tekion, Pure Storage, multiple named customers) approach Assessed criteria.

However, no internal hands-on testing has occurred, and Tracked → Assessed requires substantial evidence from direct trial findings or multi-source independent evaluations rather than vendor-published customer logos and a single independent benchmark. Sustained credit-based pricing controversy ('bait-and-switch' sentiment on r/AugmentCodeAI, quantified credit burn, polarized reviews: G2 2.8/5 vs Gartner 4.8/5), the recent CEO transition (Dietzen → McClernan), Intent macOS-only (Windows waitlist), Cosmos MAX-only preview, and unresolved reliability complaints (crashes, HTTP 400/502) all justify holding at Tracked pending hands-on validation.

Watch for

Movement triggers

Upgrade to Assessed if: internal hands-on trial or independent third-party evaluation produces documented findings, pricing sentiment stabilizes (G2 >= 4.0 with 10+ reviews, declining r/AugmentCodeAI credit-burn complaints), Intent reaches GA on Windows, Cosmos exits MAX-only preview to general availability, post-transition leadership shows continuity of roadmap execution. Downgrade if: new pricing overhaul or escalating credit-burn complaints, Intent macOS-only persists with no Windows GA progress, reliability issues (crashes, HTTP 400/502, endless loops) escalate into a sustained spike, named enterprise customer churn surfaces publicly, or post-CEO-transition strategy/execution falters.

Caution