Skip to main content
World Wide TechnologyBenchAI tool benchmarks
Coding Assistant
StatusWatch
SignalDetected
EvidenceGrade B

Amazon Q Developer

44
D -19 vs last quarter

CAUTION — END-OF-SUPPORT confirmed.

UX / DXCapabilityReliabilityValueCommunityEnterpriseAutonomyIntegration

Dimension breakdown

Score · confidence
UX / DX
50% conf55
Capability
50% conf50
ReliabilityIncomplete data at this time
Value
50% conf10
CommunityIncomplete data at this time
Enterprise / Compliance
50% conf40
Autonomy
50% conf50
Integration
50% conf60
Sources blend review platforms, community sentiment, the Signal Radar and practitioner ratings. Scores re-blend each quarter.

CAUTION — END-OF-SUPPORT confirmed. AWS official announcement (Apr 30, 2026): new signups blocked 2026-05-15; Opus 4.6 removed from Q Developer Pro 2026-05-29; full EOS for IDE plugins and paid subscriptions 2027-04-30.

AWS-recommended migration path is Kiro (kiro.dev) — VS Code foundation and CLI backward-compatible (q / q chat entry points work in Kiro CLI). Eclipse and Visual Studio users have NO native Kiro plugin — must adopt Kiro standalone IDE or Kiro CLI. Existing SOC 2 II / ISO 27001 attestations remain valid through normal audit cycle; AWS commits only to critical bugfixes through 2027-04-30, no new certifications (no HIPAA BAA, no FedRAMP).

DO NOT recommend for any new engagement. Existing deployments must plan Kiro migration by Q1 2027.

Recommended

Use cases

Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.

Score caps

Risk flags

  • Stalled development

    stabilityTemporary

    No releases or updates in 90+ days

    Caps all dimensions at 60

    Removed whenNew release published with active development signals

Assessment

Status rationale

Not Enterprise Viable — CONFIRMED TERMINAL TRAJECTORY. AWS official EOL announcement (Apr 30, 2026) is the authoritative primary source. New signups blocked 2026-05-15.

Full EOS 2027-04-30. Migration path to Kiro documented but Eclipse and Visual Studio users face material friction (no native Kiro plugin — standalone IDE or CLI only).

Existing SOC 2 II / ISO 27001 posture remains valid through normal audit cycle but no new certifications coming. Critical bugfixes only through sunset.

Recommending Q Developer for any new engagement, or for any existing engagement without a documented Kiro migration plan by Q1 2027, would be negligent. The orchestrator should consider a future schema enhancement to support a 'Deprecated' or 'Sunset' lifecycle indicator distinct from Detected — current schema captures the state correctly via stalled-development cap + viability=2 + CAUTION quick take + notEnterpriseReadyReason.

Watch for

Movement triggers

Demotion Signal

No further downward signal-level movement available in current four-tier signal model (Validated/Assessed/Tracked/Detected).

Stays at Detected with CAUTION quick take + notEnterpriseReadyReason + stalled-development cap + viability=2.

Upgrade Would Require

AWS rescission of EOL announcement AND re-commitment to Q Developer roadmap AND restoration of latest model availability (Opus 4.7+) — no plausible signals any of these will occur.

Track Kiro (kiro) as the AWS-strategic replacement.

Caution

Risks & limitations

  • Stalled Development

    Moderate

    Radar cap: stalled-development

Capabilities

Integration surface

Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.

Proof points

Adoption & benchmarks

Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.

Spotted something wrong or missing here? Suggest a change →

Per-source contributions

Click any dimension to see the underlying sources and citations.