Retool
[2026-06-17 launches: new React AI app builder GA on Cloud (apps are standard React code, not proprietary .rsx; AI-first generation; imports from Lovable/Replit/v0/Claude Code); build-anywhere governance layer extends Retool SSO/RBAC/audit to externally-generated apps; MCP-server
Dimension breakdown
Score · confidence[2026-06-17 launches: new React AI app builder GA on Cloud (apps are standard React code, not proprietary .rsx; AI-first generation; imports from Lovable/Replit/v0/Claude Code); build-anywhere governance layer extends Retool SSO/RBAC/audit to externally-generated apps; MCP-server app-import (beta); AI credit packs ($100/1k credits). → integration 14→15, interface 11→12; rating 62→63.] Low-code platform for internal tools with AI Agents for autonomous LLM-powered workflows. Source Control PRs across GitHub/GitLab/CodeCommit/Bitbucket/Azure Repos; MCP server in public beta (org management now; app-building roadmap); multi-model (Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.4, Bedrock/Vertex AI).
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, self-hosted VPC, SSO/SAML/SCIM, RBAC, audit logs — enterprise governance proven and now the strategic moat ("Code is free. Now what?", Mar 2026: resource-layer permissions + React so external agents target a governed platform).
Amazon/DoorDash/Stripe at 25,000+ companies, $200M+ ARR (crossed 2025), cashflow breakeven.
AI Agents/Assist still public beta (no GA, no production SLA, no independent reliability benchmarks); AI Assist performance complaints expanded in 2026 (slow, browser crashes, code corruption); ~9% layoff Apr 2026 (CS/recruiting/workplace; headcount 460→416) — efficiency at a profitable company, not distress, but a viability headwind; self-hosted now Enterprise-only (Feb 2026 policy change); $3.2B valuation 4yr stale; per-user pricing + SSO/self-hosted gating remain top complaints; no code export (platform lock-in); existential AI-native-builder disruption (Lovable/Bolt/v0).
Use cases
Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.
Risk flags
No active caps — no risk flags apply to this tool right now.
Status rationale
Tracked maintained. AI agent capabilities (Agents, AppGen/Assist) remain in public beta with no GA announcement, no production SLA, and no independent reliability benchmarks; AI Assist/Agent performance complaints expanded across multiple 2026 community-forum threads (extreme slowness, browser crashes, code corruption) — concentrated on the beta AI features, not yet a widespread cross-platform groundswell, so the reliability-complaints cap is not formally applied (autonomy at 10 already sits at/below its ceiling).
Strong enterprise governance (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, SSO/SAML/OIDC, SCIM, granular RBAC, audit logs, self-hosted VPC) and platform viability ($200M+ ARR crossed 2025, 25,000+ companies, cashflow breakeven, Fortune 500 base, coherent governance-moat counter-strategy to AI-native builders) are proven for the core low-code platform. The ~9% April 2026 layoff (CS/recruiting/workplace; headcount 460→416) is an efficiency move at a profitable company — a viability headwind reflected in scoring, not a funding-concerns cap trigger.
AI-specific enterprise adoption is early and unvalidated at production scale; self-hosted-Enterprise-only paywall reduces governance accessibility for mid-market without removing the capability. Agents in beta with no SLA and not_tested evidence prevent Assessed despite exceptional company viability.
Movement triggers
Upgrade to Assessed if: Agents exits public beta to GA with production SLAs and independent reliability benchmarks; AI Assist/Agent performance complaints resolve with community acknowledgment; MCP server app-building/editing capability ships GA; new funding round at a higher valuation refreshes the stale $3.2B mark; OR completed internal hands-on evaluation. Downgrade to Detected if: AI Assist/Agent reliability complaints become widespread across independent platforms (reliability-complaints cap trigger); per-user/credit pricing restructure causes documented customer churn or a community exodus to AI-native builders (Lovable/Bolt/v0); another security incident; cashflow-breakeven status reverses or further/deeper layoffs signal financial instability (funding-concerns cap trigger).
Risks & limitations
Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.
Integration surface
Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.
Adoption & benchmarks
Not yet assessed — this section fills in as ACES research covers the tool.
Spotted something wrong or missing here? Suggest a change →
Per-source contributions
Click any dimension to see the underlying sources and citations.
More in this category